Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] pvpanic: rename to isa-pvpanic
Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com> writes:
On 08/21/13 19:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/08/2013 19:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> NACK
>
> You know that a single developer's NACK counts nothing (it can be you,
> it can be me), don't you?
going meta...
What's this?
All I know (... I think I know) about patch acceptance is that Anthony
prefers to have at least one R-b. As far as I've seen this is not a hard
requirement (for example, maintainers sometimes send unreviewed patches
in a pull request, and on occasion they are merged).
I look very poorly on anyone nacking anything. I value constructive
feedback.
Nacking does not add any value to the conversation. I admire the fact
that we've been able to maintain a very high level of conversation over
the years on qemu-devel and throwing around nacks just lowers the
overall tone.
If you can't think of anything better to say than NACK, don't even
bother sending the email in the first place.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
No words have been spent on NAKs yet (... since my subscription, that
is). Is this stuff formalized somewhere?
Sorry for wasting time...
Thanks,
Laszlo