On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:49:14AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 04:20:06PM +0800, Eli Qiao wrote:
> This patch is based on Martin's cache branch.
>
> This patch amends the cache bank capability as follow:
>
> <bank id='0' level='3' type='unified'
size='15360' unit='KiB' cpus='0-5'/>
> <control min='768' unit='KiB' type='unified'
nclos='4'/>
> <bank id='1' level='3' type='unified'
size='15360' unit='KiB' cpus='6-11'/>
> <control min='768' unit='KiB' type='unified'
nclos='4'/>
Either the XML is malformed, or the indentation is wrong. The indentation
suggests you want nested XML elements, but the parent element is an empty
tag, so you've actually got a flat namespace here.
>
Were we exposing the number of CLoS IDs before? Was there a discussion
about it? Do we want to expose them? Probably yes, I'm just wondering.
What are CLoS IDs and what are they used for ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|