On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:12:26PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:02:20AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
>
> But read-only isn't all that you want -- think about giving access to a
> CD-R drive. It's not read-only, but we still need to have it exposed as
> a CD device. And with things like the bios for qemu and HVM guests, if
> a device is a CD-ROM or a hard drive makes a large difference.
>
> Thinking out loud, what if we went with something like
> <cdrom type='file'>
> <source file='/root/boot.iso'/>
> <target dev='hdc'/>
> </cdrom>
> for CDs and then similarly <floppy .../> for floppies
I wouldn't do this for CDROMs, since they basically share the same device
namespace as disks already - with versions Xen / QEMU any hda -> hdd
can be labelled as a cdrom by appending :cdrom - so they're best handled
under same XML tag as disks
For floppy disks though we could certainly have a separate <floppy>
tag name instead of <disk> - it would be clearer than distinguishing
based on the value of the 'dev' attribute.
Actually I take that back. There is a potentially never ending list of
different disk interfaces (IDE, FD, SCSI, XVDA) - I don't think we really
need to dstingiush between them by having separate <floppy> <disk>,
<cdrom>
tags, since the value of the 'dev' attribute is always unique.
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|