
9 Aug
2019
9 Aug
'19
3:06 p.m.
Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com> writes:
Either leave this as-is and add the new feature in a separate test, or you can branch the test based on QEMU versions like we do for other features:
DO_TEST_CAPS_VER("pv-spinlock-disabled", "2.7.0"); DO_TEST_CAPS_VER("pv-spinlock-disabled", "4.0.0"); DO_TEST_CAPS_LATEST("pv-spinlock-disabled");
I think I slightly prefer a new test: this way we can test both <stimer state='on'/> and <stimer state='on'> <direct state='on'/> </stimer> (and it makes no sense to test hv-stimer-direct for old QEMU versions and 4.1 is "the latest" atm). Thank you for your review, v4 is comming soon (I promise)! -- Vitaly