Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/5] conf: Add pSeries features

> My reasoning was to try and organize them the > way we already do with <kvm> and <hyperv> capabilities - even > though pSeries is not a hypervisor per se, you can kinda see > sPAPR as a specification implemented by various hypervisors, like > PowerVM and in our case QEMU/KVM. But if you think this effort is > misguided and they belong to the top-level <features> element, > then I'm okay with that too. I guess where the nesting makes sense is if there's a chance of having namespace collision between features. eg if both kvm and hyperv had a feature called "pvspinlocks", you might want to enable them separately, so the nesting is important there.