Although I suppose this could have been an RFC - I just went with
a v1. I would think at least the first 4 patches are non controversial.
Beyond that it depends on what is "expected" as output for the
capabilities output for the storage driver.
John Ferlan (7):
conf: Extract host XML formatting from virCapabilitiesFormatXML
conf: Alter virCapabilitiesFormatHostXML to take virCapsHostPtr
conf: Extract guest XML formatting from virCapabilitiesFormatXML
conf: Alter virCapabilitiesFormatGuestXML to take virCapsGuestPtr
conf: Introduce storage pool functions into capabilities
storage: Process storage pool capabilities
storage: Add storage backend pool/vol API's to capability output
src/conf/capabilities.c | 449 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
src/conf/capabilities.h | 19 ++
src/conf/virstorageobj.h | 4 +
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/storage/storage_backend.c | 65 +++++
src/storage/storage_backend.h | 3 +
src/storage/storage_driver.c | 17 ++
7 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1