Hi
Would you give me a comment on this patch?
Thanks,
Masayuki Sunou.
In message <200705291541.BEI87583.29KNGE37(a)aa.jp.fujitsu.com>
"[Libvir] [PATCH] Device attach/detach on virsh (command optionversion)"
"Masayuki Sunou <fj1826dm(a)aa.jp.fujitsu.com>" wrote:
Hi
This patch adds virsh attach-device/detach-device.
This supports a definition of a device by command option(proposal 1).
I examine the following opinions, and "attach-interface" supports only two
common case (bridge, virtual network).
Networking is more complicated because there are 8 (!) different ways
to
connected up VMs so far. We could either have huge numbers of args, or
we could just support the two common cases (bridge, virtual network) and
say for more complex cases use full XML.
Any comments are welcome!
Signed-off-by: Masayuki Sunou <fj1826dm(a)aa.jp.fujitsu.com>
Thanks,
Masayuki Sunou.
In message <200705111842.IJH95853.739E2KNG(a)aa.jp.fujitsu.com>
"Re: [Libvir] [RFC] Device attach/detach on virsh"
"Masayuki Sunou <fj1826dm(a)aa.jp.fujitsu.com>" wrote:
Hi
I understood as follows.
* There is no problem in a proposal 1 and a proposal 2
* It is better that the user can choose use of XML and use of command-option
by the situation
Therefore, I want to add both proposal 1 and proposal 2 to virsh.
There is no problem in this opinion?
And, I am going to correct about naming.
vif --> interface
vbd --> disk
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list