Re: [Libvir] PATCH: Compatability with Xen 3.2.0
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 01:19:16AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yes & yes.
The scenario where it was wrong is where you have a big NUMA system where
not all sockets were populated.
At the same time though, virNodeInfo is a part of the libvirt public ABI
and thus we have to put something in that field. So I'm choosing to continue
to the put information which matches the previous semantics, so we're no
worse off than we always were.
Fair enough, but could it at least be documented somewhere visible (I
suppose the header file would be OK) ??
thanks,
john