On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 13:44:10 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
MinGW complained that we might be dereferencing a NULL pointer.
While
^^ Does anybody use that?
that's most probably not going to be true (now), the logic
certainly
allows for that and we might actually do this a lot in the future with
sparse vcpu mapping.
../../src/conf/domain_conf.c: In function 'virDomainDefGetVcpuPinInfoHelper':
../../src/conf/domain_conf.c:1545:17: error: potential null pointer
dereference [-Werror=null-dereference]
if (vcpu->cpumask)
~~~~^~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
---
I could've pushed this as a build breaker, but I'm not really sure
everyone will like this to be handled this way. I also did another
fix for this where we don't do int->size_t->int casting all the time,
but it's probably not worth the hassle. Also I don't know whether
Peter has more stuff for this in his pockets now, so I figured I
rather submit this for review.
It's impossible since virDomainDefGetVcpu returns a valid pointer if i
is less than def->maxvcpus.
Since we are rather adding dead code than not supporting broken
toolchain ... ACK.
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Peter