On 07/25/2012 03:25 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/25/2012 02:22 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Hm, not a nice interface where qemu_close() needs the filename and
>>> (worse) could be given a wrong filename. Maybe it would be better to
>>> maintain a list of fd -> fdset mappings in qemu_open/close?
>>>
>>
>> I agree, I don't really like it either.
>>
>> We already have a list of fd -> fdset mappings (mon_fdset_fd_t ->
>> mon_fdset_t). Would it be too costly to loop through all the fdsets/fds
>> at the beginning of every qemu_close()?
>
> I don't think so. qemu_close() is not a fast path and happens almost
> never, and the list is short enough that searching it isn't a problem
> anyway.
I agree - just do the loop to do the reverse lookup yourself, rather
than making qemu_close() have a different signature than close().
Great, I'll do this then.
--
Regards,
Corey