Any kind of launch validation is ultimately security related in some
manner.
> By having the separate <sev> element you can make the sub-elements depend on
> this parent element, since you can't expect other vendors to favour
<cbitpos>
> which add burden to the documentation to make it clear. Of course, the price
> you pay for this is a more complex XML structure.
> <launch>
> <security>
> <sev>
> <sev_specific_elements/>
> </sev>
> </security>
This is not the way we usually do things - we wuld have a type="sev|..."
which determines what child elements are permitted, as illustrated in
the example above.
Oh, right. Also, having <sev> element wouldn't make it clear that you can only
have one type active, either 'sev' or some other solution.
Erik