On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:50:08PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
On 06/28/2013 01:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:43:44PM +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
>> if libvirt doesn't have the tokenizer support yet, it may be a good RFE
>> as I believe it could be really useful ;-)
>>
>> Peter, do you know about anything libvirt supports to tokenize string?
> We have virStringSplit for tokenizing strings which have a fixed
> separator.
>
>
> Daniel
That sounds good, however what about splitting the function to 2
separate functions, one accepting the second parameter as the separator,
called e.g. virStringSplitBy() and second just calling the first one
with the fixed separator?
Wouldn't it be better?
That sounds like overkill to me unless we have a clear need for it
somewhere in our code.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|