On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 05:57:41PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 28.05.2014 14:42, Shivaprasad G Bhat wrote:
During guest migration, if the domain xml is bigger than 16384 which is easily possible for a guest with good number of disks, message encode fails for xdr_remote_domain_migrate_perform3_ret(). So, Increase the COOKIE_MAX to STRING_MAX value.
Signed-off-by: Shivaprasad G Bhat <shivaprasadbhat@gmail.com> --- src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x index 1f9d583..ab9b83d 100644 --- a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x +++ b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ const REMOTE_VCPUINFO_MAX = 16384; const REMOTE_CPUMAPS_MAX = 8388608;
/* Upper limit on migrate cookie. */ -const REMOTE_MIGRATE_COOKIE_MAX = 16384; +const REMOTE_MIGRATE_COOKIE_MAX = 4194304;
/* Upper limit on lists of networks. */ const REMOTE_NETWORK_LIST_MAX = 16384;
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
I think this change is okay. I mean we have changed such size limits in the past and so far we haven't heard of any problems. And really, if you're doing old -> old migration, then it's the source that fails. If you're doing old -> new, then again, it's the source that fails. But doing new -> new is just fine. Then, one trouble might be new -> old but since we are checking the string limits, we're okay too.
ACK, but I'll wait a while with pushing and let others share their opinion
ACK Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|