On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:27:27PM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
These 3 elements conflicts with each other in either the doc
or the underlying codes are. This is to propse a solution.
Before writing any codes, I want to see if the principle is
correct, any advise is welcomed.
Current problems:
Problem 1:
The doc shouldn't simply say "These settings are superseded
by CPU tuning. " for element <vcpu>. As except the tuning, <vcpu>
allows to specify the current, maxmum vcpu number. Apart from that,
<vcpu> also allows to specify the placement as "auto", which binds
the domain process to the advisory nodeset from numad.
Problem 2:
Doc for <vcpu> says its "cpuset" specify the physical CPUs
that the vcpus can be pinned. But it's not the truth, as
actually it only pin domain process to the specified physical
CPUs. So either it's a document bug, or code bug.
Problem 3:
Doc for <vcpupin> says it supersed "cpuset" of <vcpu>, it's
not quite correct, as each <vcpupin> specify the pinning policy
only for one vcpu. How about the ones which doesn't have
<vcpupin> specified? it says the vcpu will be pinned to all
available physical CPUs, but what's the meaning of attribute
"cpuset" of <vcpu> then?
Problem 4:
Doc for <emulatorpin> says it pin the emulator threads (domain
process in other context, perhaps another follow up patch to
cleanup the inconsistency is needed) to the physical CPUs
specified its attribute "cpuset". Which conflicts with
<vcpu>'s "cpuset". And actually in the underlying codes,
it set the affinity for domain process twice if both
"cpuset" for <vcpu> and <emulatorpin> are specified,
and <emulatorpin>'s pinning will override <vcpu>'s.
Problem 5:
When "placement" of <vcpu> is "auto" (I.e. uses numad to
get the advisory nodeset to which the domain process is
pinned to), it will also be overridden by <emulatorpin>,
This patch is trying to sort out the conflicts or bugs by:
1) Don't say <vcpu> is superseded by <cputune>
You mean in the documentation of XML format?
Acutally the VCPUs placement settings of <vcpu> will be overrided
by those of <cputune>. So I think it's better to keep the words in
doc to make users aware of this.
2) Keep the semanteme for "cpuset" of <vcpu> (I.e. Still says it
specify the physical CPUs the virtual CPUs). But modifying it
to mention it also set the pinning policy for domain process,
and the CPU placement of domain process specified by "cpuset"
of <vcpu> will be ingored if <emulatorpin> specified, and
similary, the CPU placement of vcpu thread will be ignored
if it has <vcpupin> specified, for vcpu which doesn't have
<vcpupin> specified, it inherits "cpuset" of <vcpu>.
OK.
3) Don't say <vcpu> is supersed by <vcpupin>. If neither <vcpupin>
nor "cpuset" of <vcpu> is specified, the vcpu will be pinned
to all available pCPUs.
OK.
4) If neither <emulatorpin> nor "cpuset" of <vcpu> is specified,
the domain process (emulator threads in the context) will be
pinned to all available pCPUs.
OK.
5) If "placement" of <vcpu> is "auto", <emulatorpin> is
not allowed.
Conflicts with 2). Why not just override the emulator part? for vcpu
threads the "placement" is still "auto".
6) hotplugged vcpus will also inherit "cpuset" of <vcpu>
OK.
Codes changes above document changes will cause:
1) Inherit def->cpumask for each vcpu which doesn't have <vcpupin>
specified, during parsing.
OK.
2) ping the vcpu which doesn't have <vcpupin> specified to def->cpumask
s/ping/pin/
either by cgroup for sched_setaffinity(2), which is actually done
by 1).
pin vcpu according to this_vcpu->cpumask, since the cpumask either
inherits from def->cpumask(<vcpu>), or is set by <vcpupin>.
3) Error out if "placement" == "auto", and <emulatorpin> is
specified.
Otherwise, <emulatorpin> is honored, and "cpuset" of <cpuset>
is
ignored.
You mean "cpuset" of <vcpu> here?
But I still don't understand why "placement" = "auto" and
<emulatorpin>
can not both exist, but the latter overides the former.
4) Setup cgroup for each hotplugged vcpu, and setup the pinning policy
by either cgroup or sched_setaffinity(2).
OK.
5) Remove cgroup and <vcpupin> for each hot unplugged vcpu.
---
docs/formatdomain.html.in | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index d664e7e..1ae8cf4 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -357,8 +357,18 @@
the maximum supported by the hypervisor. <span
class="since">Since
0.4.4</span>, this element can contain an optional
<code>cpuset</code> attribute, which is a comma-separated
- list of physical CPU numbers that virtual CPUs can be pinned
- to. Each element in that list is either a single CPU number,
+ list of physical CPU numbers that domain process and virtual CPUs
+ can be pinned to by default. (NB: The pinning policy of domain
+ process and virtual CPUs can be specified separately by
+ <code>cputune</code>. If attribute
<code>emulatorpin</code>
+ of <code>cputune</code> is specified,
<code>cpuset</code>
+ specified by <code>vcpu</code> here will be ingored; Similarly,
+ For virtual CPUs which has <code>vcpupin</code> specified,
+ <code>cpuset</code> specified by <code>cpuset</code>
here
+ will be ignored; For virtual CPUs which doesn't have
+ <code>vcpupin</code> specified, it will be pinned to the physical
+ CPUs specified by <code>cpuset</code> here).
+ Each element in that list is either a single CPU number,
a range of CPU numbers, or a caret followed by a CPU number to
be excluded from a previous range. <span class="since">Since
0.8.5</span>, the optional attribute <code>current</code> can
@@ -374,8 +384,7 @@
if it's specified. If both <code>cpuset</code> and
<code>placement</code>
are not specified, or if <code>placement</code> is
"static", but no
<code>cpuset</code> is specified, the domain process will be pinned
to
- all the available physical CPUs. These settings are superseded
- by <a href="#elementsCPUTuning">CPU tuning</a>.
+ all the available physical CPUs.
</dd>
</dl>
@@ -411,23 +420,26 @@
<dt><code>vcpupin</code></dt>
<dd>
The optional <code>vcpupin</code> element specifies which of
host's
- physical CPUs the domain VCPU will be pinned to. This setting supersedes
- previous VCPU placement specified in <a
href="#elementsCPUAllocation">CPU
- Allocation</a> using <code>vcpu</code> element. If this is
omitted,
- each VCPU is pinned to all the physical CPUs by default. It contains two
- required attributes, the attribute <code>vcpu</code> specifies vcpu
id,
- and the attribute <code>cpuset</code> is same as
- attribute <code>cpuset</code>
- of element <code>vcpu</code>. (NB: Only qemu driver support)
+ physical CPUs the domain VCPU will be pinned to. If this is omitted,
+ and attribute <code>cpuset</code> of element
<code>vcpu</code> is
+ not specified, the vCPU is pinned to all the physical CPUs by default.
+ It contains two required attributes, the attribute
<code>vcpu</code>
+ specifies vcpu id, and the attribute <code>cpuset</code> is same as
+ attribute <code>cpuset</code> of element
<code>vcpu</code>.
+ (NB: Only qemu driver support)
<span class="since">Since 0.9.0</span>
</dd>
<dt><code>emulatorpin</code></dt>
<dd>
The optional <code>emulatorpin</code> element specifies which of
host
physical CPUs the "emulator", a subset of a domain not including
vcpu,
- will be pinned to. If this is omitted, "emulator" is pinned to all
- the physical CPUs by default. It contains one required attribute
- <code>cpuset</code> specifying which physical CPUs to pin to.
+ will be pinned to. If this is omitted, and attribute
+ <code>cpuset</code> of element <code>vcpu</code> is not
specified,
+ "emulator" is pinned to all the physical CPUs by default. It
contains
+ one required attribute <code>cpuset</code> specifying which
physical
+ CPUs to pin to. NB, <code>emulatorpin</code> is not allowed if
+ attribute <code>placement</code> of element
<code>vcpu</code> is
+ "auto".
</dd>
<dt><code>shares</code></dt>
<dd>
--
1.7.7.6
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
Thanks,
Hu Tao