On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:48:32AM +0000, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
On Sep 30, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 03:58 PM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
>> As an example, an OpenFlow controller may have certain information about the
>> port, specific to this controller, which it may want to store with the port
itself on the
>> host. This especially true if an agent exists on the host which needs to read
this data,
>> update it, and use it to perform some tasks. It's convenient to have this
data stored
>> as close to the port itself, which in this case is the OVS DB, and having it
transferred
>> as part of the migration protocol is also very handy.
>>
>
> But how big is it, and what does it look like? (I assume it's all
> printable ASCII, since you're getting it as the output of a shell command)
>
> If it's *really* large, possibly it would go better as a subelement of
> <interface>, rather than an attribute, i.e.:
>
> <interface index='1' vporttype='openvswitch'>
> <portdata>
> blah blah blah blah
> </portdata>
> </interface>
Yes. it's all printable ASCII. I think at the largest, it's possible for it to be
up to a few K (e.g. 2-4K
or so). So perhaps making it a subelement would be the way to go.
As for an example, let me talk to some controller people and see if I can scrounge one
up.
The other reason why I want to see indicitive size is to make sure we
don't risk hitting any limits on the size of the migration cookie.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|