Re: [libvirt] [RFC 5/5]: Rewrite findLuns function
Chris Lalancette schreef:
Stefan de Konink wrote:
>>> Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th lun cannot
>>> be a real entry? This assumption is wrong.
>> Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but
there is
>> code below that that is. However, the code here is generally looking for block
>> devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device. Given that,
I'm not
>> sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples?
> The 0th LUN can be a perfect block device.
OK, cool, I misunderstood. Given that, can you give me the output of:
# ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0
Just to make sure I get the right thing?
skinkie@xen01 ~ $ ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 May 26 11:28 /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0 ->
../../../devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0
skinkie@xen01 ~ $ ls
/sys/devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0
block:sdar device_blocked generic iodone_cnt iorequest_cnt
queue_depth rescan scsi_level subsystem type vendor
delete driver iocounterbits ioerr_cnt model
queue_type rev state timeout uevent
skinkie@xen01 ~ $ cat
/sys/devices/platform/host3/session3/target3:0:0/3:0:0:0/model
SOLARIS
Stefan