libvir-list-bounces(a)redhat.com wrote on 02/04/2010 08:50:29 AM:
libvir-list, Gerhard Stenzel, Vivek Kashyap
2010/2/4 Gerhard Stenzel <gstenzel(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 14:59 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> The shear size of the ruleset inside the <interface> element is
>> rather alarming to me. Imagine if you have a guest with more
>> than one NIC. I'm inclined to suggest that the <interface>
>> element in the domain XML description should only have a single
>> rule
>>
>> <filter name='BLAH'/>
>>
>> and if apps wish to construct a filter, from multiple independant
>> sub-filters, then that should be done against the filter object's
>> config, rather than the domain object's config.
>
> Daniel,
> we could achieve something similar with the following construct:
>
> <xi:include href="demofilter.xml"
>
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"/>
>
> This would also have the advantage that the filter rules do not
clutter
> up the domain xml, but the migration of the rules might be
simpler to
> implement.
> What is your thinking about this approach?
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Gerhard Stenzel,
Such an include mechanism was suggest by Dan before, but I don't think
that XInclude is a good approach, because this will make the XML
handling more complicated.
The main libvirt functions to define/create a new guest are
virDomainDefineXML and virDomainCreateXML. Both take the domain XML
description a string. They don't take filenames. Using XInclude
introduces the need for filenames to be able to reference them by the
href attribute of an XInclude element. Even if libvirt stores the
filter rules as files internally this should be considered as an
implementation detail. IMHO exposing paths to internal files isn't a
good design decision. The same is true for virDomainGetXMLDesc, it
would have to expose paths to internal files to be read by management
applications using libvirt.
I think the best approach to handle the filter setup while being able
build complex filter from simpler parts is an include mechanism, but
not using XInclude or reference the filter parts by filename, but by
filter name.
The problem with the references is the migratability. In my opinion, the
filters attached to a virtual machine's interface should migrate to a
destination host completely transparently using 'virsh migrate' and allow
migration to fail if the instantiation of the rule fails due to for
example a missing ebtables/iptables support module, but not due to missing
filter XML. This means that in the simple case where the VM had a filter
rule no-ip-spoofing active on an interface on the source this same
filtering should become active on the destination. However, most VMs will
have much more complex rules and may use references to existing templates
and add their own interface specific rules on top of that. Now how do you
migrate that? How do you handle cases where a template on the source was
referenced and may be missing on the destination or if the template on the
destination is different (ignore it?). I guess the more involved solution
would be to migrate the whole tree of referenced filters and using
internal APIs to again make them available on the host, failing if filters
with same names already exists, succeeding for others. Not sure whether
the migration protocol can handle that...
<domain>
<devices>
<interface>
<filter name='demofilter'/>
</interface>
</devices>
</domain>
<filter name='demofilter'>
<include filter='dropall'/>
...
</filter>
<filter name='dropall'>
...
</filter>
libvirt would have API to handle filters by name and their XML
description in string form, no file handling involved. Maybe something
like this in line with the rest of the libvirt API:
virConnectListFilters to list all known filters
virFilterDefineXML to define a filter from an XML description in string
form
virFilterUndefine to undefine an existing filter
virFilterGetXMLDesc to get the XML description in string form of an
existing filter
virFilterLookupByName to find a filter by name
...
Yes, initial prototype provides similar functions but does not solve the
migration problem ...
Stefan
> Matthias
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list