Re: [libvirt] [libvirt PATCH] Port-profile ID support using IFLA_VF_PORT_PROFILE netlink msg

kashyapv(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote on 05/10/2010 03:30:10 AM: via a separate Alright, then this becomes the 3rd UUID (besides guest and host UUID that Scott seems to want) to initiate the setup protocol with the switch. So the list of parameters above is necessary to be provided from the 'outside'. I am wondering what the first three parameters are related to. Do they reflect specifics of a particular attached switch ? Should this information migrate with a VM to another switch and possibly cause the setup protocol to fail because that switch requires a different manager, type or type version ID for example? Not that this would then make things easier at all (to code), but at least it would provide a correct long term solution if this information actually did not go into VM metadata but was a host's local switch configuration data that could be different for every attached Ethernet interface. This information would have to then go into some local configuration file that libvirt can read when needed. Stefan