Re: [Libvir] Re: [PATCH 1/2] virDomainMigrate implementation (Xen only, no remote, no qemu, no virsh)
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:47:59AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>If we need to express some choice of data channel, TCP, vs SSH,
vs SSL/TLS
>then figure out a way to expose that in the API with an hypervisor agnostic
>way. Exposing raw QEMU migration URIs is *not* hypervisor agnostic.
Why? If nothing but QEMU support ssh:// then exposing an API to do SSH
migration isn't really hypervisor agnostic. It's an API for QEMU.
You're presuming things never change (and that new backends never get
added to libvirt!)
regards
john