On 3/15/19 8:34 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:02:32AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> Upcoming patches want to add virDomainCheckpoint that behaves very
> similarly to virDomainCheckpoint; th eeasiest way to share common code
> is to give both classes a common base class. Thanks to the accessor
> functions in the previous patch, we have very few changes required
> outside of datatypes.[ch]. This also gets rid of the temporary rename
> hack that the previous patch used for compiler verification.
>
> struct _virDomainSnapshot {
> - virObject parent;
> - char *_name;
> - virDomainPtr _domain;
> + virDomainMoment parent;
This breaks the test suite, saying:
error : object size 32 of virDomainSnapshot is smaller than parent class 32
The error message is wrong, but yes, I'll need to patch virObject first
to allow a child class that adds nothing over its base class. (Serves
me right for mailing patches at midnight)
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:
qemu.org |
libvirt.org