On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:52:11PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Having gvir_config_object_add_child() and
gvir_config_object_replace_child() would be more obvious (even the
internal code should be splitted)
Thanks for the naming suggestions :) I'm not fully satisfied with how most
of the helpers are named, so don't hesitate to suggest better names.
One thing that is missing from the _replace_node name is that it's not
obvious that this will create a new node if needed. But I made this change
anyway, thanks!
Christophe