
15 Nov
2011
15 Nov
'11
4:49 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 04:52:11PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Having gvir_config_object_add_child() and gvir_config_object_replace_child() would be more obvious (even the internal code should be splitted)
Thanks for the naming suggestions :) I'm not fully satisfied with how most of the helpers are named, so don't hesitate to suggest better names. One thing that is missing from the _replace_node name is that it's not obvious that this will create a new node if needed. But I made this change anyway, thanks! Christophe