On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:33:56PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
To facilitate creation of new daemons providing XDR RPC services,
pull alot of the libvirtd daemon code into a set of reusable
objects.
* virNetServer: A server contains one or more services which
accept incoming clients. It maintains the list of active
clients. It has a list of RPC programs which can be used
by clients. When clients produce a complete RPC message,
the server passes this onto the corresponding program for
handling, and queues any response back with the client.
* virNetServerClient: Encapsulates a single client connection.
All I/O for the client is handled, reading & writing RPC
messages.
* virNetServerProgram: Handles processing and dispatch of
RPC method calls for a single RPC (program,version).
Multiple programs can be registered with the server.
* virNetServerService: Encapsulates socket(s) listening for
new connections. Each service listens on a single host/port,
but may have multiple sockets if on a dual IPv4/6 host.
Each new daemon now merely has to define the list of RPC procedures
& their handlers. It does not need to deal with any network related
functionality at all.
I very much like this, this is a significant chunk of code though.
And well libvirtd won't be using it with the current patch set (well
unless I missed it), I would expect a patch trimming the daemon
directory and making it use those new pieces of code, unless I missed
something. The "advantage" is that we would have immediate testing of
that code, the disadvantage being that the libvirtd may get new bugs
from the reimplementation.
Did I miss something or is the current choice of not using the
new APIs for libvird a trade-off ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/