Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] Add a virSecurityManagerSetProcessFDLabel
On 06/24/2011 09:27 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> @@ -819,4 +847,5 @@ virSecurityDriver virAppArmorSecurityDriver =
{
> AppArmorRestoreSavedStateLabel,
>
> AppArmorSetImageFDLabel,
> + AppArmorSetProcessFDLabel,
> };
Should we do a separate patch to make the security drivers use C99 named
initialization, instead of C89 order-based, to match how most other
driver callback structures are now set up?
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 619 bytes)