Re: [Libvir] [PATCH] Test libvirtd's config-processing code.
Jim Meyering <jim(a)meyering.net> wrote:
Until now, there has been no coverage of libvirtd's
config-processing code.
In adding this, (and esp. in comparing actual/expected diagnostics),
I noticed and fixed a trivial inconsistency: for a parameter expecting
a string value, an invalid values, you'd get a different diagnostic for
That should say "given an invalid value, you'd get..."
the four config parameters that are parsed via remoteConfigGetAuth
than
for all of the other config parameters (which go through checkType).
This fixes that, too: