On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:15:42AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 16:52:42 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> The virStorageFileSupportsSecurityDriver and
> virStorageFileSupportsAccess currently just return a boolean
> value. This is ok because they don't have any failure scenarios
> but a subsequent patch is going to introduce potential failure
> scenario. This changes their return type from a boolean to an
> int with values -1, 0, 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 21 +++++++++------
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 6 +++--
> src/util/virstoragefile.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> src/util/virstoragefile.h | 4 +--
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
[...]
> index f09035cd4a..da13d51d32 100644
> --- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c
> +++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
> @@ -4098,34 +4098,46 @@ virStorageFileIsInitialized(const virStorageSource *src)
[...]
> -static bool
> +static int
> virStorageFileSupportsBackingChainTraversal(virStorageSourcePtr src)
> {
> virStorageFileBackendPtr backend;
> + int ret;
Hmm, isn't 'rv' better in the case when this variable actually is not
returned?
Sure will change it.
>
> - if (!(backend = virStorageFileGetBackendForSupportCheck(src)))
> - return false;
> + ret = virStorageFileGetBackendForSupportCheck(src, &backend);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + if (!backend)
> + return 0;
>
> return backend->storageFileGetUniqueIdentifier &&
> - backend->storageFileRead &&
> - backend->storageFileAccess;
> + backend->storageFileRead &&
> + backend->storageFileAccess ? 1 : 0;
Alignment looks off
Depends on your POV - this is standard indentation after a new
line - it would only line up following lines if there was a
opening round bracket on first line. That said I'll change it
to avoid affecting pre-existing code alignment.
> }
>
>
> @@ -4137,15 +4149,19 @@
virStorageFileSupportsBackingChainTraversal(virStorageSourcePtr src)
> * Check if a storage file supports operations needed by the security
> * driver to perform labelling
> */
> -bool
> +int
> virStorageFileSupportsSecurityDriver(const virStorageSource *src)
> {
> virStorageFileBackendPtr backend;
> + int ret;
As in above hunk.
>
> - if (!(backend = virStorageFileGetBackendForSupportCheck(src)))
> - return false;
> + ret = virStorageFileGetBackendForSupportCheck(src, &backend);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -1;
> + if (backend == NULL)
> + return 0;
>
> - return !!backend->storageFileChown;
> + return backend->storageFileChown ? 1 : 0;
ACK
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|