On 12/04/2013 08:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Dan, do you have any thoughts on the best representation to use? Or is Hu's original proposal of:
<pvpanic ioport='0x505'/>
I'm not a fan of doing a special case attribute for 'ioport' - this is something something that should be part of an <address> element, since ioport numbers are a generic addressing concept for many devices. eg ISA serial / parallel ports have IRQ / IO ports IIUC.
So something more like: <pvpanic> <address type='ioport' slot='0x505'/> </pvpanic> and introducing a new type='ioport' namespace into the <address> XML since it is yet another numbering system for guest-visible addressing? -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org