On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:53:07PM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange schreef:
>On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 01:00:16AM +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>
>>+ }
>>+ }
>>+ }
>> } else if ((target == NULL) &&
>> (xmlStrEqual(cur->name, BAD_CAST "target")))
{
>> target = xmlGetProp(cur, BAD_CAST "dev");
>>@@ -1411,7 +1426,8 @@ virDomainParseXMLDiskDesc(virConnectPtr conn,
>>xmlNodePtr node,
>> virBufferVSprintf(buf, "(uname 'phy:%s')",
source);
>> else
>> virBufferVSprintf(buf, "(uname
'phy:/dev/%s')", source);
>>- }
>>+ } else if (typ == 2)
>>+ virBufferVSprintf(buf, "(uname 'phy:%s')",
source);
>
>This is leaking the 'source' string,
It is not leaking imho, since 'down under' there is an xmlFree(source).
Oh yes, you are correct.
>and a volume can be either a file
>or a physical device, so fixing it to be 'phy:' is not correct.
How can we know if the volume is a file or a device?
virStorageVolGetInfo() will tell you via the 'info' field of the struct
it fills
>We also need to apply the reverse mapping when generating the
XML. eg
>do a virStorageVolLookupByPath() to discover the volume/pool.
Mmm... that sounds not trivial... (I mean duplicate wise).
This is true - until we merge all the XML processing for drivers together
there will be a non-trivial bit of duplication
Dan.
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o-
http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org -o-
http://ovirt.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|