Hi Osier,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:37:23AM +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
[..snip..]
>Not sure I really agree with this change. The
'fchostdata' files are
>used by the 'fchosttest.c' test program. So that existing naming is
>following our conventions of naming the data dir to match the test
>program.
>
My intention was to put all the sysfs test input files together in a
directory, and keep the tree similar with real "sysfs". IMHO it's
better than having different sysfs test input files here and there,
and orgnize the tree of each of them in different manner?
I think there's pros and cons for both. With different minimal sysfs
trees we'd have a minimal test fixture so we can be sure other test data
doesn't influence the outcome. So I kind of agree with Daniel's PoV
here.
-- Guido