David Lively <dlively(a)virtualiron.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 19:16 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > + const char *name, *path;
>
> path can be const, too.
It is, at least according to my gcc (4.3.0-8, x86_64, Fedora9).
Compile the following and without FORCE_WARNING to check:
void check()
{
#ifdef FORCE_WARNING
const char *foo;
char *bar;
#else
const char *foo, *bar;
#endif
Oops. Now you know why I prefer to declare them on separate lines:
one less rule to remember that way ;-)