Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/6] Introduce new XMLs to specify disk source using storage pool/vol

On 2013年01月26日 03:12, Laine Stump wrote: >On 01/24/2013 10:44 PM, Osier Yang wrote: >> >>So you agreed with just using the "pool name and volume name"? > >I think so. Unless you can think of a situation where the pool or volume >name legitimately wouldn't be known, or would be required to be >different from one machine to another in spite of the path/key/etc being >the same. Hum, this inspires me thinking about the migration. The source and dest host could have pool && vol with the same name. However, the vol's content could be different. I.E, in this case, we will need the globally unique $IDs (pool UUID, and/or vol key).