Re: [libvirt] [RFC Incomplete Patch] Libvirt + Openvswitch
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > I do like the idea of using the virtual port construct even
in the
> > initial <interface> only case. For example:
> >
> > <interface type='bridge'>
> > <bridge name='br0'>
> > <virtualport type="openvswitch">
> > <parameters interfaceid='xyzzy'/>
> > </virtualport>
> > </interface>
NB, type='bridge' technically refers to the *concept* of bridging
an interface to a LAN, not the implemntation of Linux software
bridging. Thus it shouldn't change for OpenVSwitch which is also
providing bridging to the LAN here.
That makes sense. We'll stick with the example above.
Dan
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Wendlandt
Nicira Networks: www.nicira.com
twitter: danwendlandt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~