On 02/03/2014 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
consensus based community. Formally document what has
always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct
to prempt any potential, but unlikely, future problems.
s/prempt/preempt/ (I've also seen pre-empt, but the - bothers me).
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com>
---
docs/governance.html.in | 292 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 292 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 docs/governance.html.in
Very nice!
+ code of conduct. At a high level the code can be summarized
as
+ <em>"be excellant to each other"</em>. Expanding on this
trailing whitespace
s/excellant/excellent/
+ on other community members and the project as a whole, so
take potential
+ consequences into account before persuing a course of action.</li>
s/persuing/pursuing/
+ media postings, video blogs, user group / conference
presentations
+ and any other method of diseminating information</li>
s/diseminating/disseminating/
+ <li>User help: join the IRC channel or mailing list to
assist or advice
+ other users in troubleshooting the problems they face.</li>
Here would be an ideal place to add <a href...> pointing to the contact
page, so someone can actually find the IRC channel or list :)
+ <li>Code review: look at patches which are submitted and
critique
+ the code to identify bugs, potential design problems or other
+ issues which should be addressed before the code is accepted</li>
Maybe even mention that merely testing a build with the proposed patch
applied, without actually understanding the code, is also a valid form
of review.
+ they provide on other contributors' submissions and a
demonstration that
+ they understand day-to-day operation of the projet and its goals. There
s/projet/project/
+ There are no special requirements to becoming a committer
other than to
+ have shown a willingness and ability to contribute to the project over
+ an extended period of time. Proposals for elevating contributors to
+ committers are typically made by existing comitters, though contributors
s/comitters/committers/
+ software. The subset of project committers is chosen to be
the
+ minimal size neccessary to provide expertise spanning most of
s/neccessary/necessary/
ACK with fixes.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org