Re: [Libvir] Bug in the virDomainGetInfo() API of libvirt 0.1.9 with Xen 3.0.3
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:04:57PM +0100, Philippe Berthault wrote:
Daniel Veillard a écrit :
> I think Xen just returns -1 when the field is uninitialized, probably
>meaning 'all physical memory'. Once you use "xm mem-max 0 ..." then
it
>consider the Dom0 domain constrained, but not before. And since there
>are machine where it's possible to hot plug new memory this is a way to
>not poll the current physical memory, a bit weird but that can be
>understood.
>
The signed value -1, "casted" in C/C++ in unsigned integer, gives the
value 4294967295. The Max memory value returned by virsh is 4294967292.
There is a small difference (3), so the value returned by Xen can't be -1.
I think it's just a side effect of the conversion from pages number to
kilobytes (assuming you're on a 4k page machine)
4294967292 is (((2^32 -1) /4 ) * 4)
xen has -1, but the interface with xen usually count in page tables, and
libvirt just multiplies later to get back to kB, leading to this rounding.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/