On 09/10/2012 06:08 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
As a result of RFC:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-August/msg01998.html,
this adds two new APIs (virNode{Get,Set}SharedMemoryParameters) to get
I still think this name is too long; virNode{Get,Set}MemoryParameters
seems just fine, and is more extensible if we come up with a future node
memory turning not related to just how shared memory behaves. Anyone
else have an opinion on naming, since I'd like to see the API itself in
0.10.2?
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org