Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] network: bridge: Don't start network if it collides with host routing

> Any interest in doing this with netlink instead? (I've got this "thing" > against parsing text files to get information if it can be retrieved via > a nice clean API). If so, I think I can whip up the equivalent code with > libnl calls, but probably not until later in the afternoon. > > If I'm the only one who feels uneasy about parsing stuff out of /proc, > then I'm fine with that too. > My feeling is it depends on what else libnl buys us. A library dependency for a single safety check doesn't seem worth it. If we use the lib, we definitely don't want it to be optional, as debugging network issues in the future shouldn't require asking 'is libvirt compiled against libnl'.