Re: [libvirt] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Introduce monitor 'wait' command
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hmm. Why would you want to use -- say -- "wait 3" ? It probably will
be either "loop forever" or "single event" mode in practice. We
might
also have a "single event, but don't block if there isn't any" mode.
Yeah, I came to the same conclusion. We just need a wait-forever
command. I'll have it in the next set of patches.
--
Regards,
Anthony Liguori