On gio, 2013-06-06 at 15:50 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On gio, 2013-06-06 at 14:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> This only really matters if libvirt wants to coexist on a host with
>> toolstacks which use claim, otherwise outstanding pages will never be
>> non-zero. I don't know if coexistence is a goal or not.
>>
>>
> Sure, all this is important only if having it is
> important/interesting... Jim?
>
It would be preferable if libvirt and xl coexisted nicely. No need for
them to inter-operate (e.g. start a vm with libvirt then manage it with
xl), but managing some with xl and others with libvirt should be a goal,
I think :-/. If nothing else, it seems useful for troubleshooting. I
wouldn't want to advise a user to try xl when things are failing for
them with libvirt, only to find that afterwards their libvirt no longer
worked at all.
Mmm... I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean by this, but
anyway, I just submitted a patch to libxl adding the symbol necessary to
determine whether that field is present or not.
If it gets accepted, I can then patch libvirt to use it, within the
proper #ifdef...#endif block, of course.
Thanks everyone and Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D,
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)