On 12/17/21 7:01 AM, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 12/11/21 14:23, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> My idea was that running pkttyagent unconditionally, modulo checks that
> pkttyagent itself does to make sure it does not fail, is not going to be an
> issue turned out to be wrong. Adding back the original check for stdin being a
> tty helps in some testing scenarios as reported by Jim Fehlig and does not
> really cause any issues. I originally wanted it in because it also made
> pkttyagent auth work with redirected input into virsh (with a connection that
> requires polkit authentication and without a session-wide polkit tty agent,
> basically making pkttyagent necessary to succeed). But anyone running virsh
> like that is asking for problems already anyway =)
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/virpolkit.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
In case you want to push this:
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
And
Tested-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig(a)suse.com>
But I'd really like to get to the bottom of this. Why does sleep()
suspends for that long and why isn't polkit-agent killed?
I got sidetracked before I could dig deeper, however I did notice the test
process and all children were in a stopped state per /proc/<pid>/status. I sent
SIGCONT to the processes and the test successfully completed. I'm baffled why
these processes become stopped when pkttyagent is in the picture and work fine
otherwise.
Jim