On 12/20/2013 06:59 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 12/09/2013 04:11 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
<...snip...>
>
> +static bool
> +virDomainPanicCheckABIStability(virDomainPanicDefPtr src,
> + virDomainPanicDefPtr dst)
> +{
> + return virDomainDeviceInfoCheckABIStability(&src->info,
&dst->info);
Unlike the virDomainRNGDefCheckABIStability() API, the new
virDomainPanicCheckABIStability()
has no checks for !src && !dst
Yay for automated regression testing catching something! And sorry that
I missed this in my initial review. Yes, adding or removing the panic
device is an ABI incompatibility.
I'll put together a patch for this, but figured I'd ask now if there were
checks that should also be made in the PanicCheck API...
Not really - a panic device has only two properties: existence, and
address (the existence check is missing, which caused the core; but the
address check is already there).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org