On 01/10/2017 11:55 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 11:23 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> I'm "mostly" fine with the changes - would like resolution sooner than
> later since I have a couple of things to add to news, but I didn't want
> to cause you extra merge cycles ;-)
Yeah, same here :)
> The *one* thing I'm really having a hard time with is not ending
> sentences with a period for <description>'s.
What about <summary>?
> Especially when there's
> two or more sentences within a <description> where the first one ends
> with a period, but the second one doesn't
>
> Not ending the previous paragraph without a period was really difficult
> for my fingers. I wouldn't hold up a ACK though for having or not
> having a period.
Patch 1/3 translates the current entries directly to the new
format, without any kind of editing.
As I've said before, I have zero problems having leading
periods for all sentences in the release notes, especially
if you feel so strongly about it :) We will have to change
them all, though: an inconsistent style just won't do.
So, will you ACK this series if I promise to follow up with
a patch that adds leading periods to all <description>s?
Sure, ACK with the caveat that I barely know how to spell xlst.
Let's see what we can break before the freeze ;-)
John
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization