On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
From: Cristian Klein <cristiklein(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Klein <cristiklein(a)gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar(a)redhat.com>
---
Notes:
The migration capability is called x-postcopy-ram in QEMU, which
means it's still considered experimental. The main reason for it
is to make sure the feature is complete from libvirt's point of
view. The "x-" prefix will be removed once we have a working
implementation.
So if we decide this patchset is OK, will QEMU remove the 'x-'
prefix from their code for 2.6 ? It would be desirable not to
merge code in libvirt that uses the 'x-' prefix at all.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|