2 Jul
                
                    2013
                
            
            
                2 Jul
                
                '13
                
            
            
            
        
    
                12:34 p.m.
            
        Il 02/07/2013 08:34, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
I'm not sure if that's the right think to do or not but it's certainly better than before when memory locking limit completely ignore the need for VRAM and per-disk cache. Unfortunately, the original formula was suggested by Avi, who moved to new challenges. Perhaps others could jump in and share their opinions (Paolo? :-P).
I think the disk cache should not be counted in the memory locking limit. Apart from that, the code you posted below makes sense. Paolo