On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 07:56:47PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
virtTestResult is suboptimal for a few reasons:
- It poorly duplicates virtTestRun pass/fail reporting logic
- It doesn't have virtTestRun's alloc testing support
- It only reports the test name _after_ the test has run.
- It doesn't follow the standard virtTestRun pattern that most other
tests use.
There's no users left, so drop it. If any other async tests like eventtest
spring up that don't cleanly fit the virtTestRun pattern, I suggest they
just open code the support for it around virtTestRun
---
ACK