On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 03:29:42PM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 12/20/19 7:43 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> As pointed out by Ján Tomko, "no_memory seems suspicious in the times of
> abort()".
>
> As libvirt decided to take the path to not report OOM and simply abort
> when it happens, let's get rid of the no_memory labels and simplify the
> code around them.
>
Series:
Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
> The two exceptions are:
> - phyp code, as libvirt may end up dropping this code entirely;
> - virfirewall.c code, as it seems we heavily really on firewall->err
> being set to ENOMEM;
>
I looked at it a bit. It can probably all be ripped out but it's a
little convoluted. virCommand seems to have some similar ENOMEM handling
as well.
I think a nice prep step that will simplify this style of cleanups, is
to drop the return value from the VIR_*LLOC* macros. After the glib
conversion, they always return 0, or abort. But everywhere in the code
is still checking for 'if (VIR_ALLOC(foo) < 0)' and similar.
Long term we should replace that with g_new0 but it's not a drop in
replacement. An easy intermediate step we can do is entirely drop the '<
0' checking. This will removal a lot of 'if' conditionals that would
need to be tweaked if we work on dropping cleanup: labels now. It could
be mass done per directory and outside of a few cases I think they would
all be trivial.
When we first introduced the use of glib we declared that we should *not*
simply remove the '< 0' from VIR_ALLOC statements, because this will double
the churn in the code base by making it a 2 step conversion. We want to go
straight to g_new0, which is why we kept the "ATTRIBUTE_RETURN_CHECK"
annotation on VIR_ALLOC & friends.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
https://berrange.com -o-
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|:
https://libvirt.org -o-
https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|:
https://entangle-photo.org -o-
https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|