On 03/11/2012 10:37 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 05/03/2012 11:25, Osier Yang ha scritto:
> This introduces a new paused reason VIR_DOMAIN_PAUSED_SUSPEND,
> and new suspend event type VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_SUSPEND.
>
> While a SUSPEND event occurs, the running domain status will be
> transferred to "paused" with reason "VIR_DOMAIN_PAUSED_SUSPEND",
> and a new domain lifecycle event emitted with type
> VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_SUSPEND.
> ---
Does "virsh resume" correctly wakeup such a domain?
Ah, yes, I prohibited the situation waking up a domain which
wasn't paused by SUSPEND event. But here I forgot it.
If not, perhaps a
different state should be added so that "virsh resume" can
look at the
state and issue the appropriate monitor command (or alternatively, it
could be considered a QEMU bug).
We have the paused reason. And the patch which should be
squashed in in the attachment.
But I'm interested in trying if "virsh resume" wakeup a
domain pasued by SUSPEND event.
Osier