On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:21:42PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
On 02/02/2015 09:08 AM, Lin Ma wrote:
> * add --system flag for net-dumpxml to show information about the
> attached interfaces of the virtual network.
I don't like this extra flag - I think it is unnecessary. If we're going
to more info to the status, then we can just always add it to the status.
As to how it can be provided in the status XML (getting back to patch
1/3 which was using the netcf API in a way that I didn't like), better
data can be gathered into a list in the network object as guests are
created - this would be done in networkAllocateActualDevice() (and
networkNotifyActualDevice()) at the points where connections is
incremented for the network, and removed from the list in
networkReleaseActualDevice() where connections is decremented. You'll
notice that those functions get both the virDomainDefPtr and the
virDomainNetDefPtr, so they have enough information to store the name of
the domain as well as the namne of the interface.
I recall a long time ago considering adding this information to the
network XML, but I was dissuaded for some reason; unfortunately I don't
remember why...
>
> * call virNetworkGetXMLDesc in cmdNetworkDestroy to get the live state
> info to check whether the virtual network is in use.
>
> * add --force flag for net-destroy to forcibly destroy the virtual
> network even if it's in use.
As Michal points out (and I pointed out when you sent your previous
patchset), this does change behavior that some scripts may be dependent
on. I too like the increased safety, but am concerned about breaking
functionality. In cases like this, I always like to hear the learned
advice of Dan Berrange - Daniel, what do you say about changing the
default behavior of virsh net-destroy? Safe enough?
I don't think it is acceptable to change the behaviour. The 'destroy'
commands are unambiguous about the fact that they are a forceful
operation that will always succeed. Note that for the 'virsh destroy'
command we added a 'graceful' option, thus preserving default behaviour
> -=item B<net-dumpxml> I<network>
[I<--inactive>]
> +=item B<net-dumpxml> I<network> [I<--inactive>]
[I<--system>]
>
> Output the virtual network information as an XML dump to stdout.
> If I<--inactive> is specified, then physical functions are not
> expanded into their associated virtual functions.
> +If I<--system> is specified, then directly output the current
> +live state corresponding to this network from system.
This description of the 'system' flag just makes it sound like it is
the same as not specifying the --inactive flag. ie If the network is
running, the XML we emit is always the live XML state
Regards,
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|