Re: [libvirt] dnsmasq supporting RA instead of radvd patch

>> I'm still not thrilled that you're pushing forward with requiring 2.63 >> + a few patches backported from 2.64 into 2.63 and only checking >> against 2.63. >

My point is if you're going to add a check for 2.63 but really require 2.63 + 3 patches that Fedora has backported into their 2.63 version which was your original proposal, this would cause lots of headaches for every other distro out there unless they backported those very same patches into 2.63. So better to wait for 2.64 and go forward from there. libvirt works on and targets many more systems than Fedora.