On 25.02.2012 01:31, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/23/2012 01:44 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 15.02.2012 16:04, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> using 'system-wakeup' monitor command. It is supported only in JSON,
>> as we are enabling it if possible. Moreover, this command is available
>> in qemu-1.1+ which definitely has JSON.
>> ---
>> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 19 ++++++++++++++
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 2 +
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++
>> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 2 +
>> 5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Ping? Eric, it seems to me like you've forgotten this last patch.
Indeed, it fell off my stack of most-recently-pinged patches. Reviewing
now, and thanks for the ping...
> using 'system-wakeup' monitor command. It is supported only in JSON,
> as we are enabling it if possible. Moreover, this command is available
> in qemu-1.1+ which definitely has JSON.
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 19 ++++++++++++++
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 2 +
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++
> src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 2 +
> 5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
> +static int qemuDomainPMWakeup(virDomainPtr dom,
> + unsigned int flags)
Style nit - we aren't very consistent on whether function names begin on
line 1, but qemu_driver tends to use:
static int
qemuDomainPMWakeup(virDomainPtr dom,
unsigned int flags)
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c
> @@ -3492,3 +3492,24 @@ int qemuMonitorJSONGetBlockIoThrottle(qemuMonitorPtr mon,
> virJSONValueFree(result);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +int qemuMonitorJSONSystemWakeup(qemuMonitorPtr mon)
> +{
> + int ret = -1;
> + virJSONValuePtr cmd = NULL;
> + virJSONValuePtr reply = NULL;
> +
> + cmd = qemuMonitorJSONMakeCommand("system_wakeup", NULL);
Seems so simple :)
ACK.
Thanks for review. Fixed all nits and pushed;
Michal