On 04/04/14 06:32, Eric Blake wrote:
I'm about to add fields to virStorageFileMetadata, which means
also adding fields to the testFileData struct in virstoragetest.
Alas, adding even one pointer on an x86_64 machine gave me a
dreaded compiler error:
virstoragetest.c:712:1: error: the frame size of 4208 bytes is larger than 4096 bytes
[-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
After some experimentation, I realized that each test was creating
yet another testChainData (which contains testFileData) on the stack;
forcing the reuse of one of these structures instead of creating a
fresh one each time drastically reduces the size requirements. While
at it, I also got rid of a lot of intermediate structs, with some
macro magic that lets me directly build up the destination chains
inline.
Unfortunately it's not completely trivial to understand what's happening
on the first glance.
* tests/virstoragetest.c (mymain): Rewrite TEST_ONE_CHAIN to
reuse the same struct for each test, and to take the data
inline rather than via intermediate variables.
(testChainData): Use bounded array of pointers instead of
unlimited array of struct.
(testStorageChain): Reflect struct change.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
---
tests/virstoragetest.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
As it's test code: ACK
Peter