Re: [libvirt] [Libvirt][Sheepdog]Sheepdog pool/volume storage driver for libvirt problem

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: [...] > There's two aspects to storage management in libvirt. Eric, very thanks for your perfectly answers ;-) [...] > But without at least one online user (qemu), it > doesn't make sense to worry about offline management in libvirt (what > good is allocating a volume if you can't make any guest populate or read > from that volume). That's why we are telling you to focus on getting > your new protocol accepted into qemu first. > Actually, i also cannot quite understand why we focus on getting new protocol accepted into qemu first. Could you please expain it clearer? Thanks in advance ;-)